Halloween Movie #6
(BONUS FILM!) Please click the link to read my review of Ghostbusters.
Synopsis: Middle-aged
Second City alumni cash in on lacklustre sequel.
Blurb From the VHS
Jacket: “Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis regroup to nuke the
spooks in the highly-spirited GHOSTBUSTERS II.”
What Did I Learn?:
If you give him a second-rate script and little to do, Bill Murray will
basically just mug his way through your movie.
You Might Like This
Movie If: You've always wanted to see the sequel to *ahem* Ghostbusters.
Really?: 1) Gee...what
are the odds of Dana being the victim of not one, but two powerful, supernatural
beings in the course of five years, or that Vigo would choose the one baby in New York City whose
mother has close ties to the only people on Earth who can kill him? 2) It’s
funny how NOBODY in New York City seems to remember they were once attacked by
a Sumerian demon and a giant marshmallow man. 3) I just can’t help myself from thinking that
Vigo the Carpathian and the underground river of slime that was created by all
of the bad vibes of New York City are two completely different storylines that
were slapped together because writers Aykroyd and Ramis wanted to get this turkey
made, pronto.
Rating: There’s
nothing egregiously wrong with Ghostbusters
II, but it is predictable, formulaic, and a big let-down from the 1984
classic. While I enjoyed some of the banter between the leads, Murray mostly
looks bored (see “What Did I Learn?”),
Vigo pales in comparison with Zuul from the first film, there are a few too
many cutesy-poo scenes of Oscar the baby (and the parts when he’s in danger are
a bit disturbing), and FAR too many video montages set to bad music. The
biggest problem with Ghostbusters II,
however, is that it isn’t terribly funny, and it’s chock full of terrible
one-liners that don’t work. That’s bad writing. 6/10 stars.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097428/?ref_=rvi_tt
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.